Information on Result #546686

There is no linear OA(3162, 265, F3, 102) (dual of [265, 103, 103]-code), because residual code would yield OA(360, 162, S3, 34), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3163, 266, F3, 103) (dual of [266, 103, 104]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3164, 267, F3, 104) (dual of [267, 103, 105]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3163, 265, F3, 2, 103) (dual of [(265, 2), 367, 104]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3164, 265, F3, 2, 104) (dual of [(265, 2), 366, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3162, 265, F3, 2, 102) (dual of [(265, 2), 368, 103]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3162, 265, F3, 3, 102) (dual of [(265, 3), 633, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3162, 265, F3, 4, 102) (dual of [(265, 4), 898, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3162, 265, F3, 5, 102) (dual of [(265, 5), 1163, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (60, 162, 265)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array