Information on Result #546687

There is no linear OA(3163, 279, F3, 102) (dual of [279, 116, 103]-code), because residual code would yield OA(361, 176, S3, 34), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3164, 280, F3, 103) (dual of [280, 116, 104]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3165, 281, F3, 104) (dual of [281, 116, 105]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3164, 279, F3, 2, 103) (dual of [(279, 2), 394, 104]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3165, 279, F3, 2, 104) (dual of [(279, 2), 393, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3163, 279, F3, 2, 102) (dual of [(279, 2), 395, 103]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3163, 279, F3, 3, 102) (dual of [(279, 3), 674, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3163, 279, F3, 4, 102) (dual of [(279, 4), 953, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3163, 279, F3, 5, 102) (dual of [(279, 5), 1232, 103]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (61, 163, 279)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array