Information on Result #546718

There is no linear OA(3170, 210, F3, 111) (dual of [210, 40, 112]-code), because residual code would yield OA(359, 98, S3, 37), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3171, 211, F3, 112) (dual of [211, 40, 113]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3172, 212, F3, 113) (dual of [212, 40, 114]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3171, 210, F3, 2, 112) (dual of [(210, 2), 249, 113]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3172, 210, F3, 2, 113) (dual of [(210, 2), 248, 114]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3170, 210, F3, 2, 111) (dual of [(210, 2), 250, 112]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3170, 210, F3, 3, 111) (dual of [(210, 3), 460, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3170, 210, F3, 4, 111) (dual of [(210, 4), 670, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3170, 210, F3, 5, 111) (dual of [(210, 5), 880, 112]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (59, 170, 210)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array