Information on Result #546877
There is no linear OA(3207, 219, F3, 138) (dual of [219, 12, 139]-code), because residual code would yield OA(369, 80, S3, 46), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 904 357542 932493 278414 499056 136998 127663 / 977647 > 369 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(3208, 220, F3, 139) (dual of [220, 12, 140]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | No linear OA(3209, 221, F3, 140) (dual of [221, 12, 141]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3208, 219, F3, 2, 139) (dual of [(219, 2), 230, 140]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 4 | No linear OOA(3209, 219, F3, 2, 140) (dual of [(219, 2), 229, 141]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(3207, 219, F3, 2, 138) (dual of [(219, 2), 231, 139]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 6 | No linear OOA(3207, 219, F3, 3, 138) (dual of [(219, 3), 450, 139]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | No linear OOA(3207, 219, F3, 4, 138) (dual of [(219, 4), 669, 139]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | No linear OOA(3207, 219, F3, 5, 138) (dual of [(219, 5), 888, 139]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No digital (69, 207, 219)-net over F3 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |