Information on Result #546878

There is no linear OA(3208, 224, F3, 138) (dual of [224, 16, 139]-code), because residual code would yield OA(370, 85, S3, 46), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3209, 225, F3, 139) (dual of [225, 16, 140]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3210, 226, F3, 140) (dual of [226, 16, 141]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3209, 224, F3, 2, 139) (dual of [(224, 2), 239, 140]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3210, 224, F3, 2, 140) (dual of [(224, 2), 238, 141]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3208, 224, F3, 2, 138) (dual of [(224, 2), 240, 139]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3208, 224, F3, 3, 138) (dual of [(224, 3), 464, 139]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3208, 224, F3, 4, 138) (dual of [(224, 4), 688, 139]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3208, 224, F3, 5, 138) (dual of [(224, 5), 912, 139]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (70, 208, 224)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array