Information on Result #546931

There is no linear OA(3216, 228, F3, 144) (dual of [228, 12, 145]-code), because residual code would yield OA(372, 83, S3, 48), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3217, 229, F3, 145) (dual of [229, 12, 146]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3218, 230, F3, 146) (dual of [230, 12, 147]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3217, 228, F3, 2, 145) (dual of [(228, 2), 239, 146]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3218, 228, F3, 2, 146) (dual of [(228, 2), 238, 147]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3216, 228, F3, 2, 144) (dual of [(228, 2), 240, 145]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3216, 228, F3, 3, 144) (dual of [(228, 3), 468, 145]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3216, 228, F3, 4, 144) (dual of [(228, 4), 696, 145]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3216, 228, F3, 5, 144) (dual of [(228, 5), 924, 145]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (72, 216, 228)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array