Information on Result #546967
There is no linear OA(3228, 293, F3, 147) (dual of [293, 65, 148]-code), because residual code would yield OA(381, 145, S3, 49), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5454 903125 674302 038138 022709 253118 870603 680604 996309 484668 631548 163854 828465 899522 845238 627953 731491 227462 708997 548509 054594 512076 840977 032054 473727 036116 069732 583516 742090 980902 781249 742853 019393 892253 960097 248495 972677 421373 426141 628074 366647 / 12 085062 732503 338992 176763 549129 519718 479110 268997 150451 737221 775723 050593 147904 271161 753240 445212 100862 734331 956180 467283 411940 172483 857447 041584 506698 884680 282731 811631 103778 314212 762058 997686 304963 565740 > 381 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(3229, 294, F3, 148) (dual of [294, 65, 149]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | No linear OA(3230, 295, F3, 149) (dual of [295, 65, 150]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OOA(3229, 293, F3, 2, 148) (dual of [(293, 2), 357, 149]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 4 | No linear OOA(3230, 293, F3, 2, 149) (dual of [(293, 2), 356, 150]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(3228, 293, F3, 2, 147) (dual of [(293, 2), 358, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 6 | No linear OOA(3228, 293, F3, 3, 147) (dual of [(293, 3), 651, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | No linear OOA(3228, 293, F3, 4, 147) (dual of [(293, 4), 944, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | No linear OOA(3228, 293, F3, 5, 147) (dual of [(293, 5), 1237, 148]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No digital (81, 228, 293)-net over F3 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |