Information on Result #547086

There is no linear OA(3249, 265, F3, 165) (dual of [265, 16, 166]-code), because residual code would yield OA(384, 99, S3, 55), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3250, 266, F3, 166) (dual of [266, 16, 167]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(3250, 265, F3, 2, 166) (dual of [(265, 2), 280, 167]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(3249, 265, F3, 2, 165) (dual of [(265, 2), 281, 166]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(3249, 265, F3, 3, 165) (dual of [(265, 3), 546, 166]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3249, 265, F3, 4, 165) (dual of [(265, 4), 811, 166]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(3249, 265, F3, 5, 165) (dual of [(265, 5), 1076, 166]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (84, 249, 265)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array