Information on Result #547089

There is no linear OA(410, 15, F4, 8) (dual of [15, 5, 9]-code), because residual code would yield OA(42, 6, S4, 2), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(411, 16, F4, 9) (dual of [16, 5, 10]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(412, 17, F4, 10) (dual of [17, 5, 11]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(411, 15, F4, 2, 9) (dual of [(15, 2), 19, 10]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(412, 15, F4, 2, 10) (dual of [(15, 2), 18, 11]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(410, 15, F4, 2, 8) (dual of [(15, 2), 20, 9]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(410, 15, F4, 3, 8) (dual of [(15, 3), 35, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (2, 10, 15)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
8No linear OA(442, 48, F4, 32) (dual of [48, 6, 33]-code) [i]Residual Code
9No linear OA(48, 18, F4, 6) (dual of [18, 10, 7]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)
10No linear OA(411, 29, F4, 8) (dual of [29, 18, 9]-code) [i]