Information on Result #547387

There is no linear OA(4233, 365, F4, 168) (dual of [365, 132, 169]-code), because residual code would yield OA(465, 196, S4, 42), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4234, 366, F4, 169) (dual of [366, 132, 170]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4235, 367, F4, 170) (dual of [367, 132, 171]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4236, 368, F4, 171) (dual of [368, 132, 172]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4234, 365, F4, 2, 169) (dual of [(365, 2), 496, 170]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4235, 365, F4, 2, 170) (dual of [(365, 2), 495, 171]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4236, 365, F4, 2, 171) (dual of [(365, 2), 494, 172]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4233, 365, F4, 2, 168) (dual of [(365, 2), 497, 169]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4233, 365, F4, 3, 168) (dual of [(365, 3), 862, 169]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (65, 233, 365)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array