Information on Result #547427

There is no linear OA(4237, 268, F4, 176) (dual of [268, 31, 177]-code), because residual code would yield OA(461, 91, S4, 44), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4238, 269, F4, 177) (dual of [269, 31, 178]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4239, 270, F4, 178) (dual of [270, 31, 179]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4240, 271, F4, 179) (dual of [271, 31, 180]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4238, 268, F4, 2, 177) (dual of [(268, 2), 298, 178]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4239, 268, F4, 2, 178) (dual of [(268, 2), 297, 179]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4240, 268, F4, 2, 179) (dual of [(268, 2), 296, 180]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4237, 268, F4, 2, 176) (dual of [(268, 2), 299, 177]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4237, 268, F4, 3, 176) (dual of [(268, 3), 567, 177]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (61, 237, 268)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array