Information on Result #547429
There is no linear OA(4239, 302, F4, 176) (dual of [302, 63, 177]-code), because residual code would yield OA(463, 125, S4, 44), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 175234 933305 074206 543921 418495 881277 780883 332813 429919 101006 437404 404381 504833 864636 079141 500337 375376 052360 191696 611094 696757 939320 665090 885499 385380 009810 778380 200900 617655 056099 806688 415743 521650 982924 518318 871643 642600 732269 143252 854005 385711 951077 298974 645803 648886 013429 809152 / 2025 517705 388844 186066 624345 865386 010728 459225 322617 301863 147239 853832 944815 211835 885283 966428 532227 973928 412742 757997 253523 507788 055914 588259 352119 823340 513122 117611 644548 283151 687312 224909 613727 897424 811994 051452 501775 130990 943683 258327 507029 > 463 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(4240, 303, F4, 177) (dual of [303, 63, 178]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | No linear OA(4241, 304, F4, 178) (dual of [304, 63, 179]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No linear OA(4242, 305, F4, 179) (dual of [305, 63, 180]-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No linear OOA(4240, 302, F4, 2, 177) (dual of [(302, 2), 364, 178]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 5 | No linear OOA(4241, 302, F4, 2, 178) (dual of [(302, 2), 363, 179]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(4242, 302, F4, 2, 179) (dual of [(302, 2), 362, 180]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | No linear OOA(4239, 302, F4, 2, 176) (dual of [(302, 2), 365, 177]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 8 | No linear OOA(4239, 302, F4, 3, 176) (dual of [(302, 3), 667, 177]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No digital (63, 239, 302)-net over F4 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |