Information on Result #547473

There is no linear OA(4247, 269, F4, 184) (dual of [269, 22, 185]-code), because residual code would yield OA(463, 84, S4, 46), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4248, 270, F4, 185) (dual of [270, 22, 186]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4249, 271, F4, 186) (dual of [271, 22, 187]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4250, 272, F4, 187) (dual of [272, 22, 188]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4248, 269, F4, 2, 185) (dual of [(269, 2), 290, 186]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4249, 269, F4, 2, 186) (dual of [(269, 2), 289, 187]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4250, 269, F4, 2, 187) (dual of [(269, 2), 288, 188]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4247, 269, F4, 2, 184) (dual of [(269, 2), 291, 185]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4247, 269, F4, 3, 184) (dual of [(269, 3), 560, 185]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (63, 247, 269)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array