Information on Result #547668

There is no linear OA(28, 18, F2, 4) (dual of [18, 10, 5]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
  2. OA(210, 18, S2, 6), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(29, 19, F2, 5) (dual of [19, 10, 6]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(18, 2), 28, 5]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
3No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(18, 3), 46, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(18, 4), 64, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 5, 4) (dual of [(18, 5), 82, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 6, 4) (dual of [(18, 6), 100, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(18, 7), 118, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(28, 18, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(18, 8), 136, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (4, 8, 18)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array