Information on Result #547682

There is no linear OA(2117, 168, F2, 54) (dual of [168, 51, 55]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. OA(2116, 148, S2, 54), but
  2. OA(251, 168, S2, 20), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2118, 169, F2, 55) (dual of [169, 51, 56]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2118, 168, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(168, 2), 218, 56]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 2, 54) (dual of [(168, 2), 219, 55]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 3, 54) (dual of [(168, 3), 387, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 4, 54) (dual of [(168, 4), 555, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 5, 54) (dual of [(168, 5), 723, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 6, 54) (dual of [(168, 6), 891, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 7, 54) (dual of [(168, 7), 1059, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2117, 168, F2, 8, 54) (dual of [(168, 8), 1227, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (63, 117, 168)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array