Information on Result #547714

There is no linear OA(2234, 332, F2, 104) (dual of [332, 98, 105]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. OA(2233, 296, S2, 104), but
    • the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 40 441027 764911 159411 999678 250893 328460 000589 698723 782371 054222 923004 931887 671319 124733 067264 / 2499 525994 551277 812375 > 2233 [i]
  2. linear OA(298, 332, F2, 36) (dual of [332, 234, 37]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2235, 333, F2, 105) (dual of [333, 98, 106]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2235, 332, F2, 2, 105) (dual of [(332, 2), 429, 106]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 2, 104) (dual of [(332, 2), 430, 105]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 3, 104) (dual of [(332, 3), 762, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 4, 104) (dual of [(332, 4), 1094, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 5, 104) (dual of [(332, 5), 1426, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 6, 104) (dual of [(332, 6), 1758, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 7, 104) (dual of [(332, 7), 2090, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2234, 332, F2, 8, 104) (dual of [(332, 8), 2422, 105]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (130, 234, 332)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
11No linear OA(2235, 396, F2, 104) (dual of [396, 161, 105]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)