Information on Result #547789
There is no linear OA(3139, 160, F3, 91) (dual of [160, 21, 92]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
- OA(3138, 150, S3, 91), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 13 106423 371120 876472 986931 421169 566720 811359 868949 528224 695915 065174 686944 / 17 599301 > 3138 [i]
- OA(321, 160, S3, 10), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(321, 133, S3, 10), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 10487 287539 > 321 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(321, 133, S3, 10), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OA(3140, 161, F3, 92) (dual of [161, 21, 93]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | No linear OA(3141, 162, F3, 93) (dual of [162, 21, 94]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OOA(3140, 160, F3, 2, 92) (dual of [(160, 2), 180, 93]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
4 | No linear OOA(3141, 160, F3, 2, 93) (dual of [(160, 2), 179, 94]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(3139, 160, F3, 2, 91) (dual of [(160, 2), 181, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
6 | No linear OOA(3139, 160, F3, 3, 91) (dual of [(160, 3), 341, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | No linear OOA(3139, 160, F3, 4, 91) (dual of [(160, 4), 501, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | No linear OOA(3139, 160, F3, 5, 91) (dual of [(160, 5), 661, 92]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
9 | No digital (48, 139, 160)-net over F3 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |
10 | No linear OA(3140, 182, F3, 91) (dual of [182, 42, 92]-code) | [i] | Construction Y1 (Bound) |