Information on Result #547832

There is no linear OA(432, 41, F4, 24) (dual of [41, 9, 25]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(431, 35, F4, 24) (dual of [35, 4, 25]-code), but
  2. OA(49, 41, S4, 6), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(433, 42, F4, 25) (dual of [42, 9, 26]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(434, 43, F4, 26) (dual of [43, 9, 27]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(433, 41, F4, 2, 25) (dual of [(41, 2), 49, 26]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(434, 41, F4, 2, 26) (dual of [(41, 2), 48, 27]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(432, 41, F4, 2, 24) (dual of [(41, 2), 50, 25]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(432, 41, F4, 3, 24) (dual of [(41, 3), 91, 25]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (8, 32, 41)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array