Information on Result #547873

There is no linear OA(4136, 167, F4, 99) (dual of [167, 31, 100]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. OA(4135, 149, S4, 99), but
    • the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 040610 487096 181427 758937 498317 933435 839690 422249 792187 355243 784188 300883 648114 289820 041216 / 970 822125 > 4135 [i]
  2. OA(431, 167, S4, 18), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4137, 168, F4, 100) (dual of [168, 31, 101]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4138, 169, F4, 101) (dual of [169, 31, 102]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(4137, 167, F4, 2, 100) (dual of [(167, 2), 197, 101]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(4138, 167, F4, 2, 101) (dual of [(167, 2), 196, 102]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(4136, 167, F4, 2, 99) (dual of [(167, 2), 198, 100]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(4136, 167, F4, 3, 99) (dual of [(167, 3), 365, 100]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (37, 136, 167)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
8No linear OA(4137, 238, F4, 99) (dual of [238, 101, 100]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)