Information on Result #547969

There is no linear OA(714, 30, F7, 12) (dual of [30, 16, 13]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(713, 16, F7, 12) (dual of [16, 3, 13]-code), but
  2. linear OA(716, 30, F7, 14) (dual of [30, 14, 15]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(715, 31, F7, 13) (dual of [31, 16, 14]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(715, 30, F7, 2, 13) (dual of [(30, 2), 45, 14]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(714, 30, F7, 2, 12) (dual of [(30, 2), 46, 13]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(714, 30, F7, 3, 12) (dual of [(30, 3), 76, 13]-NRT-code) [i]
5No digital (2, 14, 30)-net over F7 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(721, 35, F7, 18) (dual of [35, 14, 19]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)