Information on Result #548353

There is no linear OA(2163, 174, F2, 82) (dual of [174, 11, 83]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(281, 91, F2, 41) (dual of [91, 10, 42]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2164, 175, F2, 83) (dual of [175, 11, 84]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2164, 174, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(174, 2), 184, 84]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(174, 2), 185, 83]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(174, 3), 359, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 4, 82) (dual of [(174, 4), 533, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 5, 82) (dual of [(174, 5), 707, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(174, 6), 881, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(174, 7), 1055, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2163, 174, F2, 8, 82) (dual of [(174, 8), 1229, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (81, 163, 174)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array