Information on Result #548360

There is no linear OA(2169, 184, F2, 84) (dual of [184, 15, 85]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(285, 99, F2, 42) (dual of [99, 14, 43]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2170, 185, F2, 85) (dual of [185, 15, 86]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2170, 184, F2, 2, 85) (dual of [(184, 2), 198, 86]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 2, 84) (dual of [(184, 2), 199, 85]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 3, 84) (dual of [(184, 3), 383, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 4, 84) (dual of [(184, 4), 567, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 5, 84) (dual of [(184, 5), 751, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 6, 84) (dual of [(184, 6), 935, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 7, 84) (dual of [(184, 7), 1119, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2169, 184, F2, 8, 84) (dual of [(184, 8), 1303, 85]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (85, 169, 184)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array