Information on Result #548364

There is no linear OA(2171, 183, F2, 86) (dual of [183, 12, 87]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(285, 96, F2, 43) (dual of [96, 11, 44]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2172, 184, F2, 87) (dual of [184, 12, 88]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2172, 183, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(183, 2), 194, 88]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(183, 2), 195, 87]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 3, 86) (dual of [(183, 3), 378, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 4, 86) (dual of [(183, 4), 561, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 5, 86) (dual of [(183, 5), 744, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 6, 86) (dual of [(183, 6), 927, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 7, 86) (dual of [(183, 7), 1110, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2171, 183, F2, 8, 86) (dual of [(183, 8), 1293, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (85, 171, 183)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array