Information on Result #548429
There is no linear OA(2254, 278, F2, 124) (dual of [278, 24, 125]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(2130, 153, F2, 62) (dual of [153, 23, 63]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2131, 154, F2, 63) (dual of [154, 23, 64]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OA(2255, 279, F2, 125) (dual of [279, 24, 126]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | No linear OA(2256, 280, F2, 126) (dual of [280, 24, 127]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No linear OA(2257, 281, F2, 127) (dual of [281, 24, 128]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | No linear OOA(2255, 278, F2, 2, 125) (dual of [(278, 2), 301, 126]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
5 | No linear OOA(2256, 278, F2, 2, 126) (dual of [(278, 2), 300, 127]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2257, 278, F2, 2, 127) (dual of [(278, 2), 299, 128]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 2, 124) (dual of [(278, 2), 302, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
8 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 3, 124) (dual of [(278, 3), 580, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
9 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 4, 124) (dual of [(278, 4), 858, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
10 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 5, 124) (dual of [(278, 5), 1136, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
11 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 6, 124) (dual of [(278, 6), 1414, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
12 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 7, 124) (dual of [(278, 7), 1692, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
13 | No linear OOA(2254, 278, F2, 8, 124) (dual of [(278, 8), 1970, 125]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
14 | No digital (130, 254, 278)-net over F2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |
15 | No linear OA(2255, 288, F2, 124) (dual of [288, 33, 125]-code) | [i] | Construction Y1 (Bound) |