Information on Result #548530

There is no linear OA(211, 58, F2, 4) (dual of [58, 47, 5]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(210, 34, F2, 4) (dual of [34, 24, 5]-code), but
  2. linear OA(247, 58, F2, 24) (dual of [58, 11, 25]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(212, 59, F2, 5) (dual of [59, 47, 6]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(212, 58, F2, 2, 5) (dual of [(58, 2), 104, 6]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(58, 2), 105, 5]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(58, 3), 163, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(58, 4), 221, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 5, 4) (dual of [(58, 5), 279, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 6, 4) (dual of [(58, 6), 337, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(58, 7), 395, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(211, 58, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(58, 8), 453, 5]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (7, 11, 58)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
11No linear OA(249, 60, F2, 24) (dual of [60, 11, 25]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)