Information on Result #548636

There is no linear OA(710, 42, F7, 8) (dual of [42, 32, 9]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(79, 14, F7, 8) (dual of [14, 5, 9]-code), but
  2. linear OA(732, 42, F7, 28) (dual of [42, 10, 29]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(711, 43, F7, 9) (dual of [43, 32, 10]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(711, 42, F7, 2, 9) (dual of [(42, 2), 73, 10]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(710, 42, F7, 2, 8) (dual of [(42, 2), 74, 9]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(710, 42, F7, 3, 8) (dual of [(42, 3), 116, 9]-NRT-code) [i]
5No digital (2, 10, 42)-net over F7 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(735, 45, F7, 30) (dual of [45, 10, 31]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)