Information on Result #548684

There is no linear OA(342, 61, F3, 27) (dual of [61, 19, 28]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(315, 33, F3, 9) (dual of [33, 18, 10]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(343, 62, F3, 28) (dual of [62, 19, 29]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(343, 61, F3, 2, 28) (dual of [(61, 2), 79, 29]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(342, 61, F3, 2, 27) (dual of [(61, 2), 80, 28]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(342, 61, F3, 3, 27) (dual of [(61, 3), 141, 28]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(342, 61, F3, 4, 27) (dual of [(61, 4), 202, 28]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(342, 61, F3, 5, 27) (dual of [(61, 5), 263, 28]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (15, 42, 61)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array