Information on Result #58060

There is no OA(278, 145, S2, 34), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6 452658 897421 925882 991923 762933 214377 859980 440698 591468 415644 336128 / 20 712793 240469 221474 764436 259197 787149 263939 > 278

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OA(279, 146, S2, 35) [i]Truncation
2No OOA(279, 145, S2, 2, 35) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No OOA(278, 145, S2, 2, 34) [i]Depth Reduction
4No OOA(278, 145, S2, 3, 34) [i]
5No OOA(278, 145, S2, 4, 34) [i]
6No OOA(278, 145, S2, 5, 34) [i]
7No OOA(278, 145, S2, 6, 34) [i]
8No OOA(278, 145, S2, 7, 34) [i]
9No OOA(278, 145, S2, 8, 34) [i]
10No (44, 78, 145)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
11No linear OA(2146, 214, F2, 68) (dual of [214, 68, 69]-code) [i]Residual Code