Information on Result #58810

There is no OA(359, 136, S3, 35), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 22 726839 204691 891253 644696 898369 207187 081234 181735 714843 341275 897616 762362 710018 187521 018627 172327 868695 031408 531569 772970 640083 192156 200366 308595 435159 925930 757650 433436 609239 366400 / 1549 254697 196676 010642 793897 637084 831954 187799 248006 962271 072379 219020 389873 109263 689496 974500 056880 902187 125508 048087 135151 525741 030050 717474 931926 817179 > 359

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(359, 136, S3, 2, 35) [i]Depth Reduction
2No OOA(359, 136, S3, 3, 35) [i]
3No OOA(359, 136, S3, 4, 35) [i]
4No OOA(359, 136, S3, 5, 35) [i]
5No (24, 59, 136)-net in base 3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(3164, 242, F3, 105) (dual of [242, 78, 106]-code) [i]Residual Code