Information on Result #58848

There is no OA(363, 149, S3, 37), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 46 631470 124673 049327 400235 264470 858493 236508 054985 173899 541299 524620 475842 712041 549727 037290 684522 127992 940560 161444 675369 235323 506654 361935 251741 549444 156200 159989 526202 879027 434375 / 37 524831 135040 905996 809144 831977 213264 438373 079442 262970 729827 862827 594743 088766 089529 538795 972448 769675 682777 166896 727335 845836 387566 113951 189899 042231 > 363

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(363, 149, S3, 2, 37) [i]Depth Reduction
2No OOA(363, 149, S3, 3, 37) [i]
3No OOA(363, 149, S3, 4, 37) [i]
4No OOA(363, 149, S3, 5, 37) [i]
5No (26, 63, 149)-net in base 3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
6No linear OA(3174, 261, F3, 111) (dual of [261, 87, 112]-code) [i]Residual Code