Information on Result #609994

Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 63) (dual of [96, 2, 64]-code), using repeating each code word 32 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 62) (dual of [96, 2, 63]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 61) (dual of [96, 2, 62]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 60) (dual of [96, 2, 61]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 59) (dual of [96, 2, 60]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 58) (dual of [96, 2, 59]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 57) (dual of [96, 2, 58]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 56) (dual of [96, 2, 57]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(294, 96, F2, 55) (dual of [96, 2, 56]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(293, 95, F2, 62) (dual of [95, 2, 63]-code) [i]Truncation
10Linear OA(292, 94, F2, 61) (dual of [94, 2, 62]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(290, 92, F2, 59) (dual of [92, 2, 60]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(289, 91, F2, 58) (dual of [91, 2, 59]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(287, 89, F2, 56) (dual of [89, 2, 57]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(286, 88, F2, 55) (dual of [88, 2, 56]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(284, 86, F2, 53) (dual of [86, 2, 54]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(283, 85, F2, 52) (dual of [85, 2, 53]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(281, 83, F2, 50) (dual of [83, 2, 51]-code) [i]
18Linear OA(280, 82, F2, 49) (dual of [82, 2, 50]-code) [i]
19Linear OA(278, 80, F2, 47) (dual of [80, 2, 48]-code) [i]
20Linear OA(277, 79, F2, 46) (dual of [79, 2, 47]-code) [i]
21Linear OA(275, 77, F2, 44) (dual of [77, 2, 45]-code) [i]
22Linear OOA(294, 48, F2, 2, 63) (dual of [(48, 2), 2, 64]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
23Linear OOA(294, 32, F2, 3, 63) (dual of [(32, 3), 2, 64]-NRT-code) [i]