Information on Result #609998

Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 55) (dual of [84, 2, 56]-code), using repeating each code word 28 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 54) (dual of [84, 2, 55]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 53) (dual of [84, 2, 54]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 52) (dual of [84, 2, 53]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 51) (dual of [84, 2, 52]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 50) (dual of [84, 2, 51]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 49) (dual of [84, 2, 50]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(282, 84, F2, 48) (dual of [84, 2, 49]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(281, 83, F2, 54) (dual of [83, 2, 55]-code) [i]Truncation
9Linear OA(280, 82, F2, 53) (dual of [82, 2, 54]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(278, 80, F2, 51) (dual of [80, 2, 52]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(277, 79, F2, 50) (dual of [79, 2, 51]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(275, 77, F2, 48) (dual of [77, 2, 49]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(274, 76, F2, 47) (dual of [76, 2, 48]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(272, 74, F2, 45) (dual of [74, 2, 46]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(271, 73, F2, 44) (dual of [73, 2, 45]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(269, 71, F2, 42) (dual of [71, 2, 43]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(268, 70, F2, 41) (dual of [70, 2, 42]-code) [i]
18Linear OA(266, 68, F2, 39) (dual of [68, 2, 40]-code) [i]
19Linear OA(265, 67, F2, 38) (dual of [67, 2, 39]-code) [i]
20Linear OOA(282, 42, F2, 2, 55) (dual of [(42, 2), 2, 56]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
21Linear OOA(282, 28, F2, 3, 55) (dual of [(28, 3), 2, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
22Linear OOA(282, 12, F2, 7, 55) (dual of [(12, 7), 2, 56]-NRT-code) [i]