Information on Result #610001

Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 49) (dual of [75, 2, 50]-code), using repeating each code word 25 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 48) (dual of [75, 2, 49]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 47) (dual of [75, 2, 48]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 46) (dual of [75, 2, 47]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 45) (dual of [75, 2, 46]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 44) (dual of [75, 2, 45]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(273, 75, F2, 43) (dual of [75, 2, 44]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(272, 74, F2, 48) (dual of [74, 2, 49]-code) [i]Truncation
8Linear OA(271, 73, F2, 47) (dual of [73, 2, 48]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(269, 71, F2, 45) (dual of [71, 2, 46]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(268, 70, F2, 44) (dual of [70, 2, 45]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(266, 68, F2, 42) (dual of [68, 2, 43]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(265, 67, F2, 41) (dual of [67, 2, 42]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(263, 65, F2, 39) (dual of [65, 2, 40]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(262, 64, F2, 38) (dual of [64, 2, 39]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(260, 62, F2, 36) (dual of [62, 2, 37]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(259, 61, F2, 35) (dual of [61, 2, 36]-code) [i]
17Linear OOA(273, 25, F2, 3, 49) (dual of [(25, 3), 2, 50]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
18Linear OOA(273, 15, F2, 5, 49) (dual of [(15, 5), 2, 50]-NRT-code) [i]