Information on Result #610003
Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 45) (dual of [69, 2, 46]-code), using repeating each code word 23 times based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 44) (dual of [69, 2, 45]-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction | |
2 | Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 43) (dual of [69, 2, 44]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 42) (dual of [69, 2, 43]-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 41) (dual of [69, 2, 42]-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OA(267, 69, F2, 40) (dual of [69, 2, 41]-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OA(266, 68, F2, 44) (dual of [68, 2, 45]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
7 | Linear OA(265, 67, F2, 43) (dual of [67, 2, 44]-code) | [i] | ||
8 | Linear OA(263, 65, F2, 41) (dual of [65, 2, 42]-code) | [i] | ||
9 | Linear OA(262, 64, F2, 40) (dual of [64, 2, 41]-code) | [i] | ||
10 | Linear OA(260, 62, F2, 38) (dual of [62, 2, 39]-code) | [i] | ||
11 | Linear OA(259, 61, F2, 37) (dual of [61, 2, 38]-code) | [i] | ||
12 | Linear OA(257, 59, F2, 35) (dual of [59, 2, 36]-code) | [i] | ||
13 | Linear OA(256, 58, F2, 34) (dual of [58, 2, 35]-code) | [i] | ||
14 | Linear OA(254, 56, F2, 32) (dual of [56, 2, 33]-code) | [i] | ||
15 | Linear OOA(267, 23, F2, 3, 45) (dual of [(23, 3), 2, 46]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding |