Information on Result #610368

Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 71) (dual of [96, 2, 72]-code), using repeating each code word 24 times based on linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 70) (dual of [96, 2, 71]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 69) (dual of [96, 2, 70]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 68) (dual of [96, 2, 69]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 67) (dual of [96, 2, 68]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(394, 96, F3, 66) (dual of [96, 2, 67]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(393, 95, F3, 70) (dual of [95, 2, 71]-code) [i]Truncation
7Linear OA(392, 94, F3, 69) (dual of [94, 2, 70]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(391, 93, F3, 68) (dual of [93, 2, 69]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(389, 91, F3, 66) (dual of [91, 2, 67]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(388, 90, F3, 65) (dual of [90, 2, 66]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(387, 89, F3, 64) (dual of [89, 2, 65]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(385, 87, F3, 62) (dual of [87, 2, 63]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(384, 86, F3, 61) (dual of [86, 2, 62]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(383, 85, F3, 60) (dual of [85, 2, 61]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(381, 83, F3, 58) (dual of [83, 2, 59]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(380, 82, F3, 57) (dual of [82, 2, 58]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(379, 81, F3, 56) (dual of [81, 2, 57]-code) [i]
18Linear OA(377, 79, F3, 54) (dual of [79, 2, 55]-code) [i]
19Linear OOA(394, 48, F3, 2, 71) (dual of [(48, 2), 2, 72]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
20Linear OOA(394, 32, F3, 3, 71) (dual of [(32, 3), 2, 72]-NRT-code) [i]