Information on Result #610375

Linear OA(366, 68, F3, 50) (dual of [68, 2, 51]-code), using repeating each code word 17 times based on linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(366, 68, F3, 49) (dual of [68, 2, 50]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(366, 68, F3, 48) (dual of [68, 2, 49]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(366, 68, F3, 47) (dual of [68, 2, 48]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(365, 67, F3, 49) (dual of [67, 2, 50]-code) [i]Truncation
5Linear OA(364, 66, F3, 48) (dual of [66, 2, 49]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(363, 65, F3, 47) (dual of [65, 2, 48]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(361, 63, F3, 45) (dual of [63, 2, 46]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(360, 62, F3, 44) (dual of [62, 2, 45]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(359, 61, F3, 43) (dual of [61, 2, 44]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(357, 59, F3, 41) (dual of [59, 2, 42]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(356, 58, F3, 40) (dual of [58, 2, 41]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(355, 57, F3, 39) (dual of [57, 2, 40]-code) [i]
13Linear OOA(366, 34, F3, 2, 50) (dual of [(34, 2), 2, 51]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding