Information on Result #640578
Linear OA(996, 112, F9, 62) (dual of [112, 16, 63]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8120, 28, F81, 20) (dual of [28, 8, 21]-code or 28-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(61,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8120, 81, F81, 20) (dual of [81, 61, 21]-code or 81-arc in PG(19,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.