Information on Result #640592
Linear OA(9106, 124, F9, 68) (dual of [124, 18, 69]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8122, 31, F81, 22) (dual of [31, 9, 23]-code or 31-arc in PG(21,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8122, 81, F81, 22) (dual of [81, 59, 23]-code or 81-arc in PG(21,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(59,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8122, 81, F81, 22) (dual of [81, 59, 23]-code or 81-arc in PG(21,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(9106, 62, F9, 2, 68) (dual of [(62, 2), 18, 69]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |