Information on Result #640692
Linear OA(992, 100, F9, 67) (dual of [100, 8, 68]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8116, 20, F81, 16) (dual of [20, 4, 17]-code or 20-arc in PG(15,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8116, 81, F81, 16) (dual of [81, 65, 17]-code or 81-arc in PG(15,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(65,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8116, 81, F81, 16) (dual of [81, 65, 17]-code or 81-arc in PG(15,81)), using
- linear OA(93, 5, F9, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,9) or 5-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(93, 9, F9, 3) (dual of [9, 6, 4]-code or 9-arc in PG(2,9) or 9-cap in PG(2,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.