Information on Result #640735
Linear OA(988, 96, F9, 64) (dual of [96, 8, 65]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8112, 16, F81, 12) (dual of [16, 4, 13]-code or 16-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8112, 81, F81, 12) (dual of [81, 69, 13]-code or 81-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(69,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8112, 81, F81, 12) (dual of [81, 69, 13]-code or 81-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- linear OA(94, 6, F9, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(94, 9, F9, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.