Information on Result #640764
Linear OA(9122, 128, F9, 97) (dual of [128, 6, 98]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(8113, 16, F81, 13) (dual of [16, 3, 14]-code or 16-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(68,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8113, 81, F81, 13) (dual of [81, 68, 14]-code or 81-arc in PG(12,81)), using
- linear OA(96, 8, F9, 6) (dual of [8, 2, 7]-code or 8-arc in PG(5,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(96, 9, F9, 6) (dual of [9, 3, 7]-code or 9-arc in PG(5,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(3,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(96, 9, F9, 6) (dual of [9, 3, 7]-code or 9-arc in PG(5,9)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.