Information on Result #644238
Linear OA(841, 69, F8, 25) (dual of [69, 28, 26]-code), using construction X applied to AG(F,38P) ⊂ AG(F,41P) based on
- linear OA(839, 64, F8, 25) (dual of [64, 25, 26]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,38P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- linear OA(836, 64, F8, 22) (dual of [64, 28, 23]-code), using algebraic-geometric code AG(F,41P) [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65 (see above)
- linear OA(82, 5, F8, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(82, 8, F8, 2) (dual of [8, 6, 3]-code or 8-arc in PG(1,8)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.