Information on Result #663435

Linear OA(846, 49, F8, 41) (dual of [49, 3, 42]-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
  1. linear OA(85, 7, F8, 5) (dual of [7, 2, 6]-code or 7-arc in PG(4,8)), using
  2. linear OA(86, 7, F8, 6) (dual of [7, 1, 7]-code or 7-arc in PG(5,8)), using
  3. linear OA(87, 7, F8, 7) (dual of [7, 0, 8]-code or 7-arc in PG(6,8)), using
  4. linear OA(87, 7, F8, 7) (dual of [7, 0, 8]-code or 7-arc in PG(6,8)) (see above)
  5. linear OA(87, 7, F8, 7) (dual of [7, 0, 8]-code or 7-arc in PG(6,8)) (see above)
  6. linear OA(87, 7, F8, 7) (dual of [7, 0, 8]-code or 7-arc in PG(6,8)) (see above)
  7. linear OA(87, 7, F8, 7) (dual of [7, 0, 8]-code or 7-arc in PG(6,8)) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(845, 48, F8, 40) (dual of [48, 3, 41]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OA(844, 47, F8, 39) (dual of [47, 3, 40]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(843, 46, F8, 38) (dual of [46, 3, 39]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(842, 45, F8, 37) (dual of [45, 3, 38]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(841, 44, F8, 36) (dual of [44, 3, 37]-code) [i]
6Linear OOA(846, 24, F8, 2, 41) (dual of [(24, 2), 2, 42]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
7Linear OOA(846, 16, F8, 3, 41) (dual of [(16, 3), 2, 42]-NRT-code) [i]