Information on Result #672683

Linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 15) (dual of [16400, 16300, 16]-code), using construction X4 applied to Ce(14) ⊂ Ce(12) based on
  1. linear OA(299, 16384, F2, 15) (dual of [16384, 16285, 16]-code), using an extension Ce(14) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
  2. linear OA(285, 16384, F2, 13) (dual of [16384, 16299, 14]-code), using an extension Ce(12) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16383 = 214−1, defining interval I = [1,12], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
  3. linear OA(215, 16, F2, 15) (dual of [16, 1, 16]-code or 16-arc in PG(14,2)), using
  4. linear OA(21, 16, F2, 1) (dual of [16, 15, 2]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2100, 16400, F2, 14) (dual of [16400, 16300, 15]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2101, 16401, F2, 15) (dual of [16401, 16300, 16]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OA(2102, 16402, F2, 15) (dual of [16402, 16300, 16]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2103, 16403, F2, 15) (dual of [16403, 16300, 16]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(2104, 16404, F2, 15) (dual of [16404, 16300, 16]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(299, 16399, F2, 14) (dual of [16399, 16300, 15]-code) [i]Truncation
7Linear OOA(2100, 8200, F2, 2, 15) (dual of [(8200, 2), 16300, 16]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
8Linear OOA(2100, 4100, F2, 4, 15) (dual of [(4100, 4), 16300, 16]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(2100, 3280, F2, 5, 15) (dual of [(3280, 5), 16300, 16]-NRT-code) [i]