Information on Result #677599

Linear OA(389, 96, F3, 58) (dual of [96, 7, 59]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,159]) ⊂ C([1,105]) ⊂ C([1,99]) based on
  1. linear OA(379, 80, F3, 79) (dual of [80, 1, 80]-code or 80-arc in PG(78,3)), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3159, 160, F3, 159) (dual of [160, 1, 160]-code or 160-arc in PG(158,3)), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,159], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 160 [i]
  2. linear OA(375, 80, F3, 52) (dual of [80, 5, 53]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3155, 160, F3, 105) (dual of [160, 5, 106]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,105], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 106 [i]
  3. linear OA(373, 80, F3, 49) (dual of [80, 7, 50]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(3153, 160, F3, 99) (dual of [160, 7, 100]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 38−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
  4. linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
  5. linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(389, 96, F3, 57) (dual of [96, 7, 58]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OOA(389, 48, F3, 2, 58) (dual of [(48, 2), 7, 59]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
3Linear OOA(389, 32, F3, 3, 58) (dual of [(32, 3), 7, 59]-NRT-code) [i]