Information on Result #685901

Linear OA(769, 78, F7, 47) (dual of [78, 9, 48]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,95]) ⊂ C([1,65]) ⊂ C([1,63]) based on
  1. linear OA(747, 48, F7, 47) (dual of [48, 1, 48]-code or 48-arc in PG(46,7)), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(795, 96, F7, 95) (dual of [96, 1, 96]-code or 96-arc in PG(94,7)), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,95], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 96 [i]
  2. linear OA(740, 48, F7, 32) (dual of [48, 8, 33]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(788, 96, F7, 65) (dual of [96, 8, 66]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,65], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 66 [i]
  3. linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
  4. linear OA(721, 29, F7, 14) (dual of [29, 8, 15]-code), using
  5. linear OA(70, 1, F7, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

None.