Information on Result #685904

Linear OA(761, 72, F7, 40) (dual of [72, 11, 41]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,81]) ⊂ C([1,63]) ⊂ C([1,53]) based on
  1. linear OA(745, 48, F7, 40) (dual of [48, 3, 41]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(793, 96, F7, 81) (dual of [96, 3, 82]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,81], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 82 [i]
  2. linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
  3. linear OA(737, 48, F7, 26) (dual of [48, 11, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(785, 96, F7, 53) (dual of [96, 11, 54]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
  4. linear OA(710, 18, F7, 8) (dual of [18, 8, 9]-code), using
  5. linear OA(74, 6, F7, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,7)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(761, 36, F7, 2, 40) (dual of [(36, 2), 11, 41]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
2Linear OOA(761, 24, F7, 3, 40) (dual of [(24, 3), 11, 41]-NRT-code) [i]