Information on Result #685909

Linear OA(759, 70, F7, 39) (dual of [70, 11, 40]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,79]) ⊂ C([1,63]) ⊂ C([1,53]) based on
  1. linear OA(744, 48, F7, 39) (dual of [48, 4, 40]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(792, 96, F7, 79) (dual of [96, 4, 80]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,79], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 80 [i]
  2. linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
  3. linear OA(737, 48, F7, 26) (dual of [48, 11, 27]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(785, 96, F7, 53) (dual of [96, 11, 54]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
  4. linear OA(79, 16, F7, 7) (dual of [16, 7, 8]-code), using
  5. linear OA(74, 6, F7, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,7)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(759, 35, F7, 2, 39) (dual of [(35, 2), 11, 40]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding