Information on Result #690838
Linear OA(970, 91, F9, 48) (dual of [91, 21, 49]-code), using construction XX applied to C([1,99]) ⊂ C([1,85]) ⊂ C([1,83]) based on
- linear OA(964, 80, F9, 49) (dual of [80, 16, 50]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9144, 160, F9, 99) (dual of [160, 16, 100]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [1,99], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 100 [i]
- linear OA(960, 80, F9, 42) (dual of [80, 20, 43]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9140, 160, F9, 85) (dual of [160, 20, 86]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [1,85], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 86 [i]
- linear OA(958, 80, F9, 41) (dual of [80, 22, 42]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(9138, 160, F9, 83) (dual of [160, 22, 84]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 160 | 94−1, defining interval I = [1,83], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 84 [i]
- linear OA(95, 10, F9, 5) (dual of [10, 5, 6]-code or 10-arc in PG(4,9)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(5,9) [i]
- linear OA(90, 1, F9, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.