Information on Result #737754

Linear OA(746, 61, F7, 31) (dual of [61, 15, 32]-code), using construction X applied to C([1,63]) ⊂ C([1,49]) based on
  1. linear OA(739, 48, F7, 31) (dual of [48, 9, 32]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(787, 96, F7, 63) (dual of [96, 9, 64]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,63], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 64 [i]
  2. linear OA(733, 48, F7, 24) (dual of [48, 15, 25]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(781, 96, F7, 49) (dual of [96, 15, 50]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 96 | 74−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
  3. linear OA(77, 13, F7, 6) (dual of [13, 6, 7]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(751, 71, F7, 31) (dual of [71, 20, 32]-code) [i]VarÅ¡amov–Edel Lengthening